Appendix B: Checklists and Worksheets
Tear these out (metaphorically) and use them. They're the operational core of the book.
Vendor due-diligence checklist
Ask in writing. Score the answers. Walk away from evasions.
- [ ] Track record is third-party audited, with monthly returns including losing periods (not screenshots)
- [ ] Sharpe ratio stated; between ~0.5 and 2.0 is plausible, above 3 is a red flag
- [ ] Maximum drawdown and longest recovery time disclosed
- [ ] Backtest is survivorship-free (delisted/bankrupt securities included) and point-in-time (no future information)
- [ ] Number of strategy variants tested disclosed (multiple-testing inflation accounted for)
- [ ] Results are net of all costs: commissions, spreads, slippage, data, subscriptions
- [ ] Named humans with verifiable regulatory registrations (check Investor.gov)
- [ ] Withdrawals unrestricted: no lock-ups, advance fees, or gates
- [ ] Stress-event behavior described: kill switch, position limits, overnight exposure
- [ ] Vendor's compensation disclosed; own-capital participation stated
- [ ] Data and methodology describable at a conceptual level (no "proprietary AI" hand-waving)
Scam red flags
One flag: investigate. Two: walk away. Three: report.
- [ ] Guaranteed or fixed daily/monthly returns promised
- [ ] "Rent-a-bot" or "profit box" pricing
- [ ] Recruitment via WhatsApp/Telegram groups
- [ ] "SEC regulated" claims you can't verify on Investor.gov
- [ ] Form D brandished as proof of approval (it's just a notice filing)
- [ ] Advance fees required to withdraw your own money
- [ ] Referral/MLM commissions for recruiting others
- [ ] No named, registered humans behind the operation
- [ ] Overseas operators, no domestic accountability
- [ ] Pressure tactics: countdowns, "spots remaining," urgency to fund now
- [ ] No audited track record net of costs
Fee worksheet
Fill this in before funding anything. Be ruthless.
| Cost | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Subscription/software | $ | $ |
| Commissions (est.) | $ | $ |
| Spreads + slippage (est.) | $ | $ |
| Market data / API fees | $ | $ |
| VPS / cloud hosting | $ | $ |
| Borrow / margin costs | $ | $ |
| Total all-in cost | $ | $ |
| Account size | $ | |
| All-in cost as % of account | % |
Rules of thumb: if all-in costs exceed 2–3% of the account annually, the strategy needs a genuine, persistent edge just to break even. If a flat fee alone exceeds 5% of the account, the math is prohibitive: fund more capital or don't start.
Tax pre-flight
Answer before running anything high-turnover in a taxable account:
- [ ] Expected after-tax return computed (short-term rates up to 37% federal + state)
- [ ] Compared against a tax-efficient buy-and-hold alternative
- [ ] Wash-sale exposure mapped across all accounts, including spouse's and retirement accounts
- [ ] No strategy activity inside IRAs that could permanently destroy losses via wash sales
- [ ] 1099-B reconciliation plan exists for multi-account activity
- [ ] CPA consulted (especially before considering Section 475 mark-to-market election)
The satellite-account rules
If you run an AI trading satellite alongside your core plan:
- Separate account: separate mental ledger, never commingled with retirement or goal funds
- Hard funding cap, set in advance (common ceiling: ≤5% of investable assets)
- Kill switch tested before first live trade: one action flattens everything
- Daily loss limit coded in: the system halts itself, no discretion
- Position caps: no single position can endanger the account
- Paper-trade first, for months: to test plumbing and discipline, not to prove profitability
- Quarterly review against the after-tax benchmark: shut down what doesn't earn its keep
- Core funded first: the satellite never gets money the plan needs
Sources and further reading
Public sources consulted for this book (late 2026). Verify current details before acting. Vendors change terms frequently.
- Regulatory: SEC.gov (FY2026 exam priorities); FINRA.org (Notice 24-09, 2026 Oversight Report); ESMA (MiFID II Article 17); EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689)
- Institutions: Reuters (Jane Street revenue reporting); company disclosures (Virtu Financial); industry analysis (Lowenstein Sandler alt-data survey 2025)
- Retail tools: vendor sites for Trade Ideas, TrendSpider, Tickeron, Danelfin, StockHero, Composer, OptionAlpha; Condor Capital robo-industry reports; MarketWatch (AI vs. robo-advisers, July 2026)
- Research/AI: Bloomberg (ASKB, BloombergGPT statements); Nasdaq (execution algorithms, Verafin); arxiv.org (options-pricing ML papers)
- Scams/enforcement: SEC litigation releases (Cryptoaiml/TSAI, Sept 2025; Delphia/Global Predictions, Mar 2024); FBI IC3 2025 report
- Methodology: practitioner literature on backtest overfitting, survivorship bias, and walk-forward validation (see chapter references)
Thank you for reading.